Perioperative Nutritional Support in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

上达 范;Chung Mau lo;Edward Lai;Kent Man Chu;Chi Leung Liu;John Wong

China Association for Science and Technology

发表时间:1994-12-8

期 刊:New England Journal of Medicine

语 言:English

U R L: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027943764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

摘要

Background: Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Since intensive nutritional support can reduce the catabolic response and improve protein synthesis and liver regeneration, we performed a prospective study to investigate whether perioperative nutritional support could improve outcome in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: We studied 124 patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sixty-four patients (39 with cirrhosis, 18 with chronic active hepatitis, and 7 with no associated liver disease) were randomly assigned to receive perioperative intravenous nutritional support in addition to their oral diet, and 60 patients (33 with cirrhosis, 12 with chronic active hepatitis, and 15 with no associated liver disease) were randomly assigned to a control group. The perioperative nutritional therapy consisted of a solution enriched with 35 percent branched-chain amino acids, dextrose, and lipid emulsion (50 percent medium-chain triglycerides) given intravenously for 14 days perioperatively. Results: There was a reduction in the overall postoperative morbidity rate in the perioperative-nutrition group as compared with the control group (34 percent vs. 55 percent; relative risk, 0.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.96), predominantly because of fewer septic complications (17 percent vs. 37 percent; relative risk, 0.57; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.96). There were also a reduction in the requirement for diuretic agents to control ascites (25 percent vs. 50 percent; relative risk, 0.57; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.87), less weight loss after hepatectomy (median loss, 0 kg vs. 1.4 kg; P = 0.01), and less deterioration of liver function as measured by the change in the rate of clearance of indocyanine green (-2.8 percent vs. -4.8 percent at 20 minutes, P = 0.05). These benefits were seen predominantly in the patients with underlying cirrhosis who underwent major hepatectomy. There were five deaths during hospitalization in the perioperative-nutrition group, and nine in the control group (P not significant). Conclusions: Perioperative nutritional support can reduce complications after major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with cirrhosis., Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality13. This is because the majority of patients have cirrhosis, and hepatectomy causes further deterioration of liver function4 due to the loss of functioning liver mass. Postoperative sepsis is the other main cause of morbidity and mortality and may be due in part to an enhanced catabolic response to surgery, increased proteolysis, and decreased immunocompetence in patients with cirrhosis who are already hypercatabolic,5,6 malnourished, and immunocompromised7. Since intensive nutritional therapy can reduce the net catabolic response to surgery,8 improve protein synthesis (which is critical…

相关科学

医学

文献指纹

医学与生命科学

Nutritional Support

Hepatectomy

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Fibrosis

Morbidity

Chronic Hepatitis

Confidence Intervals

Liver Diseases

Control Groups

Liver

Immunocompetence

Branched Chain Amino Acids

Liver Regeneration

Indocyanine Green

Emulsions

Mortality

Diuretics

Ascites

Proteolysis

Weight Loss

Sepsis

Triglycerides

Hospitalization

Proteins

Diet

Lipids

Prospective Studies

Glucose

Therapeutics

被引量

期刊度量

Scopus度量

年份 CiteScore SJR SNIP
1996
1997
1998
1999 7.361 10.989
2000 8.367 10.43
2001 8.571 10.65
2002 9.315 11.39
2003 10.407 13.878
2004 11.349 13.963
2005 9.888 12.13
2006 10.173 11.886
2007 10.481 11.853
2008 11.386 11.487
2009 11.765 11.932
2010 13.149 11.382
2011 56 13.674 12.685
2012 60.2 13.984 13.287
2013 58 14.796 14.706
2014 57.3 16.259 13.935
2015 57.4 16.591 13.011
2016 61.1 18.009 12.685
2017 67.2 19.476 12.908
2018 73.1 19.524 13.73
2019 66.1 18.291 13.212
2020 67.6

相似文献推荐