Inhaled Combined Budesonide–Formoterol as Needed in Mild Asthma

Paul M. O’Byrne;J. Mark FitzGerald;Eric D. Bateman;Peter J. Barnes;南山 钟;Christina Keen;Carin Jorup;Rosa Lamarca;Stefan Ivanov;Helen K. Reddel

McMaster University;University of British Columbia;University of Cape Town;Imperial College London;Guangzhou Medical College;AstraZeneca;University of Sydney

发表时间:2018-5-17

期 刊:New England Journal of Medicine

语 言:English

U R L: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047358356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

摘要

BACKGROUND In patients with mild asthma, as-needed use of an inhaled glucocorticoid plus a fast-acting β2-agonist may be an alternative to conventional treatment strategies. METHODS We conducted a 52-week, double-blind trial involving patients 12 years of age or older with mild asthma. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three regimens: twice-daily placebo plus terbutaline (0.5 mg) used as needed (terbutaline group), twice-daily placebo plus budesonide–formoterol (200 μg of budesonide and 6 μg of formoterol) used as needed (budesonide–formoterol group), or twice-daily budesonide (200 μg) plus terbutaline used as needed (budesonide maintenance group). The primary objective was to investigate the superiority of as-needed budesonide–formoterol to as-needed terbutaline with regard to electronically recorded weeks with well-controlled asthma. RESULTS A total of 3849 patients underwent randomization, and 3836 (1277 in the terbutaline group, 1277 in the budesonide–formoterol group, and 1282 in the budesonide maintenance group) were included in the full analysis and safety data sets. With respect to the mean percentage of weeks with well-controlled asthma per patient, budesonide–formoterol was superior to terbutaline (34.4% vs. 31.1% of weeks; odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.30; P=0.046) but inferior to budesonide maintenance therapy (34.4% and 44.4%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.73). The annual rate of severe exacerbations was 0.20 with terbutaline, 0.07 with budesonide–formoterol, and 0.09 with budesonide maintenance therapy; the rate ratio was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.49) for budesonide–formoterol versus terbutaline and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.16) for budesonide–formoterol versus budesonide maintenance therapy. The rate of adherence in the budesonide maintenance group was 78.9%. The median metered daily dose of inhaled glucocorticoid in the budesonide–formoterol group (57 μg) was 17% of the dose in the budesonide maintenance group (340 μg). CONCLUSIONS In patients with mild asthma, as-needed budesonide–formoterol provided superior asthma-symptomcontroltoas-neededterbutaline,assessedaccordingtoelectronically recordedweekswithwell-controlledasthma,butwasinferiortobudesonidemaintenance therapy. Exacerbation rates with the two budesonide-containing regimens were similar and were lower than the rate with terbutaline. Budesonide–formoterol used as needed resulted in substantially lower glucocorticoid exposure than budesonide maintenance therapy. (Funded by AstraZeneca; SYGMA 1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02149199.)

相关科学

医学

文献指纹

医学与生命科学

Budesonide

Asthma

Formoterol Fumarate

Terbutaline

Maintenance

Glucocorticoids

Confidence Intervals

Placebos

Odds Ratio

Therapeutics

Random Allocation

Datasets

Safety

被引量

期刊度量

Scopus度量

年份 CiteScore SJR SNIP
1996
1997
1998
1999 7.361 10.989
2000 8.367 10.443
2001 8.571 10.65
2002 9.315 11.398
2003 10.407 13.89
2004 11.349 13.978
2005 9.888 12.146
2006 10.173 11.886
2007 10.481 11.853
2008 11.386 11.484
2009 11.765 11.981
2010 13.149 11.418
2011 56 13.674 12.752
2012 60.2 13.984 13.306
2013 58 14.796 14.752
2014 57.3 16.259 13.9
2015 57.4 16.591 13.011
2016 61.1 18.009 12.721
2017 67.2 19.476 12.937
2018 73.1 19.524 13.754
2019 66.1 18.291 12.989
2020 80.6 19.889 14.809
2021 83.6

相似文献推荐