Normative values of pulmonary function testing in Chinese adults

Jinping Zheng;南山 钟

Guangzhou Medical College;China Association for Science and Technology

发表时间:2002

期 刊:Chinese Medical Journal

语 言:English

U R L: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036163834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

摘要

Objectives. To compare the difference in pulmonary function between Caucasians and Chinese and assess the best reference values of pulmonary function for Chinese adults. Methods. Values for pulmonary function were predicted by tests on 4773 Chinese healthy subjects (male: 2560, female: 2213, aged 15-78 years) in six parts (north, northeast, northwest, east, southwest and south) of China. Prediction equations of the European Community for Steel and Coal (ECSC), other equations for overseas Chinese or for Caucasians were also selected. The regression coefficients of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, total lung capacity (TLC) and residual volume (RV) were summarized. Results. ECSC predictions were closer to the Chinese ones than other selected equations. Comparison with ECSC predictions showed that on average the values for FVC, FEV1 were 5.3% smaller in Chinese males and 3.3% smaller in Chinese females, with the maximal differences in south China and the minimal differences in North China. RV and TLC in Chinese were lower than in Caucasians (males 4.8%, 5.5%, respectively; females 8.7% and 6.0%, respectively). Conversion factors were given for adjusting ECSC equations to fit Chinese. Conclusions. For predicting values of pulmonary function in Chinese, we suggest to use the equations reported here. Alternatively, ECSC regression equations may be used with appropriate conversion factors.

关键词

Chinese
Normative value
Pulmonary function

相关科学

医学

文献指纹

医学与生命科学

European Union

Vital Capacity

Total Lung Capacity

Lung

China

Residual Volume

Forced Expiratory Volume

Reference Values

Healthy Volunteers

被引量

期刊度量

Scopus度量

年份 CiteScore SJR SNIP
1996
1997
1998
1999 0.129 0.158
2000 0.143 0.167
2001 0.127 0.111
2002 0.143 0.15
2003 0.208 0.364
2004 0.249 0.339
2005 0.305 0.423
2006 0.301 0.38
2007 0.329 0.4
2008 0.356 0.484
2009 0.393 0.568
2010 0.388 0.653
2011 1.6 0.4 0.594
2012 1.6 0.376 0.584
2013 1.7 0.446 0.677
2014 1.9 0.486 0.628
2015 2 0.443 0.55
2016 2.1 0.422 0.518
2017 2.3 0.52 0.631
2018 2.6 0.504 0.66
2019 2.5 0.452 0.636
2020 3.3
2021

相似文献推荐